Does Prior Breast Irradiation Increase Complications of Subsequent Reduction Surgery in Breast Cancer Patients? A systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Reduction mammoplasty and mastopexy are potentially complicated by prior breast irradiation as part of breast conserving therapy. Associated tissue changes with therapeutic irradiation have led to surgeons deciding the risks may outweigh potential benefit for those patients. A systematic review of the existing literature was performed to explore surgical outcomes of patients undergoing delayed bilateral reduction mammoplasty or mastopexy following unilateral breast irradiation as part of breast conserving therapy. METHODS: Medline, PubMed and EMBASE were searched from 1990 to 2023 according to PRISMA guidelines. Studies were combined by the generic inverse variance method on the natural logarithms of rate ratios (RR) using a random effect model in Review manager 5.4.1. RESULTS: Fifteen studies reported outcomes in 188 patients who underwent breast reduction (BR) following unilateral breast conserving surgery and radiotherapy. The median age at BR was 51.5 years (range 39-60), and median time since radiotherapy was 48 months (range 11.7-86). We compared outcomes for irradiated breast (IB) versus non-irradiated breast (NIB). Pooled results showed higher rate of major complications in the IB (RR 2.52, 95%CI 0.96-6.63, p=0.06), but not statistically significant. However, rate of minor complications was significantly higher in the IB (RR 3.97 95%CI 1.86-8.50, p<0.0004). Incidence of fat necrosis as a discrete complication was 2× higher in IB (RR 2.14 95%CI 0.85-5.35, p-value 0.10) compared to the NIB, but not significant. CONCLUSION: We found breast reduction to be safe with acceptable risk of major complications. However, the overall complication rate remains higher in IB compared to NIB. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Reviewing Outcomes and Complications with the Use of Mesh in Breast Reduction Surgery.

INTRODUCTION: Reduction mammoplasty is a common reconstructive and esthetic procedure with variable long-term outcomes regarding breast shape, projection, and nipple-areolar complex. One common complaint is recurrent breast ptosis, which may be mitigated by sufficient support of the inferior pole. This review will look at the effects of mesh in mitigating postoperative ptosis following reduction mammoplasty. METHODS: A comprehensive review of the literature was performed using the PubMed database. Manuscripts that provided data with respect to the effects of mesh on cosmetic outcomes, patient-reported outcomes, complications, and surveillance were utilized. RESULTS: Six studies with a total of 634 patients were included in this review. There is limited evidence to support a cosmetic benefit with the use of mesh in reduction mammoplasty patients. While subjective satisfaction was demonstrated in one paper, few others had objective measurements of the impact of mesh. Complications included infection, skin necrosis, and loss of nipple sensation. Mammography was found to not be affected by mesh placement. DISCUSSION: The use of mesh during reduction mammoplasty is a relatively modern innovation that does not appear to have a significantly different risk profile than that of traditional reduction procedures. There is limited cosmetic value based on currently available data. More objective future analysis is necessary in order to justify the use of mesh in reduction mammoplasty for its claimed cosmetic benefits. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine Ratings, please refer to Table of Contents or online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.

The Cost of Ambulatory Breast Reduction: Hospital Reimbursement Versus Surgeon Payments.

Introduction: Reduction mammoplasty (RM) is one of the most common operations performed in plastic surgery. While US national surgical expenditures have risen in recent years, studies have reported decreasing reimbursement rates for plastic surgeons. The purpose of this study is to characterize the trends in charges and payments for a common plastic surgery operation, ambulatory RM, for facilities and physicians. Methods: A Medicare patient records database was used to capture hospital, surgeon, and anesthesiologist charges and payments for ambulatory RM from 2005 to 2014. Values were adjusted for inflation. A ratio of hospital to surgeon charges and payments were calculated: charge multiplier (CM) and payment multiplier (PM), respectively. Charges, payments, Charlson comorbidity index, CM, and PM values were analyzed for trends. Results: This study included 1001 patients. During the study period, the facility charge for RM per patient increased from $8477 to $11,102 (31% increase; p < .0005), and the surgeon charge increased from $7088 to $7199 (2% increase; p = .0009). Facility payments increased from $3661 to $3930 (7% increase; p < .0005), and surgeon payments decreased from $1178 to $1002 (15% decrease; p < .0005). CM increased from 1.2 to 1.54, and PM increased from 3.11 to 3.92. Conclusions: Charges and payments to facilities for ambulatory RM increased disproportionately to that of surgeons, likely due in part to rising administrative costs in health care delivery. This may disincentivize plastic surgeons from offering RM at hospital-based surgical centers, limiting patient access to this operation.

Introduction: La mammoplastie de réduction (MR) est l'une des interventions les plus courantes pratiquées en chirurgie plastique. Alors que les dépenses chirurgicales aux États-Unis ont augmenté au niveau national au cours des dernières années, les études ont signalé une diminution des taux de remboursement pour les chirurgiens plasticiens. L'objectif de cette étude est de définir les tendances dans les frais et paiements pour une intervention courante de chirurgie plastique, une MR ambulatoire, pour les établissements et pour les médecins. Méthodes: Une base de données des dossiers de patients Medicare a été utilisée pour collecter les frais pour les hôpitaux, les chirurgiens et les anesthésiologistes ainsi que les paiements pour MR ambulatoires de 2005 à 2014. Les valeurs ont été ajustées pour tenir compte de l'inflation. Des ratios des frais hôpital/chirurgien et des paiements ont été calculés : respectivement, un facteur de multiplication des frais (MF) et des paiements (MP). Les tendances de la valeur des frais, des paiements, de l'indice de comorbidité de Charlson, du MF et du MP ont été analysées. Résultats: Cette étude a inclus 1001 patients. Au cours de la période de l'étude, les frais pour MR par patient à la charge de l'établissement ont augmenté de 8 477 $ à 11 102 $, soit une augmentation de 31 % (P < 0,0005) et les frais du chirurgien sont passés de 7 088 $ à 7 199 $, soit une augmentation de 2 % (P = 0,0009). Les paiements de l'établissement ont augmenté de 3 661 $ à 3 930 $, soit une augmentation de 7 % (P < 0,0005) et les paiements du chirurgien ont diminué de 1 178 $ à 1 002 $, soit une diminution de 15 % (P < 0,0005). Le facteur MF est passé de 1,2 à 1,54 et le facteur MP est passé de 3,11 à 3,92. Conclusions: Les frais et paiements aux établissements pour MR ambulatoire ont augmenté de manière disproportionnée par rapport à ceux des chirurgiens, probablement en partie à cause de l'augmentation des coûts administratifs croissants de l'administration des soins. Cela pourrait inciter les chirurgiens plasticiens à ne plus offrir de MR dans les centres chirurgicaux hospitaliers et pourrait donc limiter l'accès des patients à cette opération.

Masculinizing Mammoplasty for Female-to-Male Transgenders: 10 Years' Experience.

BACKGROUND: Masculinizing mammoplasty is a surgical procedure frequently performed in transmale individuals. Despite providing a positive impact for the patient, this surgery has high rates of complications and revisions. In cases requiring a double incision, there are advantages in using an inferior pedicle when possible. METHODS: This was an observational study. Outcomes and complications were analyzed in 104 patients operated on by the author using three techniques: concentric periareolar surgery, double incision with an areola graft, and double incision with an inferior areolar pedicle. The Breast-Q questionnaire adapted for transgender males was applied. RESULTS: The responses of the adapted Breast-Q questionnaires demonstrated high scores regarding quality of life and satisfaction. The rates of complications and surgical revisions were 24.3 and 25.6%, respectively, with no significant difference between the techniques. The most common complication was hematoma (13.6%), which was positively associated with the use of testosterone. Ischemia of the nipple-areola complex was present in 8.7% of the operated breasts. When using the inferior pedicle, areola ischemia occurred more often when the nipple-fold distance was greater than 8 cm. CONCLUSIONS: Quality of life, satisfaction, complications, and revisions were comparable to those observed in the literature. Hematoma was the most frequent complication, and an association with the use of testosterone was observed. When a double incision is indicated, the inferior pedicle is more advantageous than the areola graft; however, it should be used when the distance between the nipple and the inframammary fold is 8 cm or less. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

3D Analysis of Breast Morphological Changes after Vertical-Scar Reduction Mammoplasty: A Prospective Study.

BACKGROUND: In addition to symptom relief, the crucial objective of reduction mammoplasty is to achieve a stable and esthetically pleasing postoperative breast shape. However, the morphological changes in breasts following reduction mammoplasty have not been comprehensively understood. In this study, we applied three-dimensional (3D) scanning technology for long-term follow-up monitoring of breast morphological changes to discern their changing trends. Our goal was to provide a reliable basis for assessing postoperative effects and determining follow-up time points. METHODS: This prospective study included patients undergoing vertical-scar reduction mammoplasty. We utilized a combination of linear measurements and 3D scanning to measure various parameters, including breast volume, breast volume distribution, nipple position, and scar length at various time points: pre-surgery, immediately post-surgery, 3-month postoperative, 6-month postoperative, and 1-year postoperative. RESULTS: A total of 115 patients were enrolled in this study. Throughout the initial 3 months of postoperative follow-up, there was a gradual reduction in breast volume, which tended to stabilize from 3 to 12 months. The nipple position showed a gradual shift both laterally, inferiorly, and posteriorly. The volume of the lower and lateral part of the breast increased gradually. Notably, at 1 year after surgery, the scar length was approximately 6.3% shorter compared to the immediate postoperative measurement. CONCLUSIONS: Our 3D analysis unveiled comprehensive changes in breast morphology: The overall breast volume shifted laterally and inferiorly, the nipple position moved laterally, inferiorly, and posteriorly, and there was a significant reduction in scar length. Concurrently, breast volume exhibited a gradual decrease and stabilization after 3 months, establishing it as a suitable follow-up point for assessing postoperative results. Additionally, surgical plans can be formulated based on the overall trend of changes in breast volume and distribution, combined with methods such as three-dimensional scanning, to enhance surgical outcomes and patient satisfaction. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to authors www.springer.com/00266 .

The impact of race and ethnicity in outpatient breast reconstruction decision-making and postoperative outcomes: A propensity score-matched NSQIP analysis.

BACKGROUND: Recent literature has established outpatient breast reconstruction (BR) to be a safe alternative to inpatient BR. However, the impact of race and ethnicity on BR patient decision-making and postsurgical outcomes remains unexplored. This study aims to assess the impact of race and ethnicity on outpatient BR timing and postoperative complication rates. METHODS: The 2013-2020 ACS-NSQIP database was utilized to identify women undergoing outpatient BR. Propensity score-matched analysis was conducted to generate balanced cohorts based on race and ethnicity. t-tests and Fisher's exact tests were used to assess group differences. Logistic regressions were modeled to evaluate differences in complications between groups. RESULTS: A total of 63,526 patients underwent outpatient BR. After propensity score matching, 7664 patients and 3948 patients were included in the race and ethnicity-based analysis, respectively. There were statistically significant differences in the timing of BR patients received across cohorts. NW patients had lower rates of immediate BR (IBR) compared with White patients (47% vs. 53%, p < 0.001), and this also was seen in Hispanic patients (97% vs. 3%, p = 0.018). Subsequently, there were higher rates of delayed BR (DBR) in the NW cohort (55% vs. 45%, p < 0.001) and in the Hispanic cohort (95% vs. 5%, p = 0.018). There were no significant differences in the rates of 30-day postoperative complications across cohorts. CONCLUSIONS: Ultimately, our findings suggest that minority patients are more likely to undergo DBR than nonminority patients. However, there were no differences in 30-day postoperative outcomes across race or ethnicity. Future studies to elucidate patients' decision-making process in choosing optimal BR types and timing are necessary to better understand the impact of the observed differences in patient care.

Retrospective Study on Optimizing Breast Augmentation Outcomes in Transgender Patients: A Comprehensive Analysis of Tumescent Local Anesthesia Technique.

BACKGROUND: Tumescent local anesthesia (TLA) involves the infusion of a saline solution containing lidocaine and epinephrine into tissues to achieve localized anesthesia and vasoconstriction. While the use of TLA in sub-glandular augmentation mammoplasty has been documented, we present a modified TLA approach for primary sub-muscular breast augmentation in transgender patients based on our experience over the past years. METHODS: Between the years 2014 and 2021, we performed primary sub-muscular breast augmentation on 20 transgender patients under TLA and conscious sedation. The tumescent solution consisted of 25 mL of 2% lidocaine, 8 mEq of sodium bicarbonate, and 1 mL of epinephrine (1 mg/1 mL) in 1000 mL of 0.9% saline solution. Initially, the solution was infiltrated between the pectoral fascia and the mammary gland, and subsequently, during the surgery, under the pectoralis major muscle. RESULTS: The average volume of tumescent solution infiltrated during TLA was 740 mL per breast. There were no reports of adrenaline or lidocaine toxicity, and no cases required a conversion to general anesthesia. Patients experienced no pain or discomfort during the preoperative infiltration or surgical procedure. Reoperations due to short-term complications never occurred. We observed a major complication rate of 5%, represented by 1 hematoma. Long-term complications comprised one case of implant dislocation and one occurrence of dystrophic scar formation. No cases of capsular contracture needing reoperation, asymmetry, and implant rupture occurred. In total, one individual (5%) requested larger implants. Follow-up time ranged from 30 days to 1 years. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, augmentation mammaplasty is a valuable choice for transgender women aiming to enhance their feminine characteristics and alleviate gender dysphoria. It is imperative for patients to conduct thorough research, grasp the potential pros and cons, and consult experienced healthcare professionals in transgender care. Additionally, tumescent local anesthesia (TLA) has proven to be a safe and efficient method for sub-muscular breast augmentation, providing effective pain control with minimal postoperative complications, resulting in high patient satisfaction. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Feasibility and Safety of Superomedial Pedicle for Breast Reduction in Geriatric Patients.

INTRODUCTION:  Historically, inferior breast reduction is more commonly performed overall and this applies to the elder population. No study to this date has compared whether there is any difference in complications and overall safety between when using superomedial pedicle and inferior pedicle in geriatric patients and furthermore whether the safety profile of superomedial pedicle differs when compared to general population. METHODS: Patient files of women who had undergone breast reduction by a single surgeon over a 9 year period (2015-2023) was reviewed retrospectively. Patients over 65 years old at the time of surgery were selected as the main study group. Results were compared to a control group aged 65 years and younger consisting of 136 patients, who also had a breast reduction by the same surgeon. RESULTS: Fifty-four women met the inclusion criteria for the study group and they were further broken down into two subgroups; inferior and superomedial pedicle groups with 25 and 29 patients into each group, respectively. The mean age at the time of the operation was 67.8 years. Geriatric group had more significant comorbidities (37% vs. 9%, p<0.05). Looking solely on patients undergone superomedial pedicle breast reduction, OR times were similar between two age groups and hospital stay was slightly longer in the geriatric population albeit statistically insignificant. The average weight of specimens resected from each breast was 592.4 gr in geriatric population and slightly higher in the younger population with an average weight of 624 grams (p=0.27). Two women in the geriatric group and  six women in the  non-geriatric group developed major complications where superomedial pedicle was utilized, no meaningful difference was seen when major complications were compared (p=0.24). On the other hand, minor complications were significantly higher in the geriatric population compared to the younger cohort regarding superomedial pedicle reductions (p=0.02). 'Satisfaction with breasts' scores of BreastQ from the superomedial breast reduction subgroup was slightly higher than inferior pedicle breast reduction subgroup in geriatric population and it was statistically significant (0.032). CONCLUSION: Safety margins and satisfaction scores of superomedial pedicled breast reduction in geriatric patients seem similar to their younger counterparts. Furthermore, with similar complication rates and with its slightly higher 'Satisfaction with breasts'  scores  when compared to inferior pedicle, superomedial pedicled breast reduction technique can be utilized without reservation in geriatric candidates for breast reduction. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Technical Refinements for Reducing Reoperations in Single-Stage Augmentation Mastopexy: A Retrospective Matched Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: The goals of mastopexy differ significantly from those of augmentation mammoplasty. Mastopexy is designed to lift and reshape the breasts, while augmentation mammoplasty is designed to increase the volume of the breasts. This conflict causes that one-stage augmentation mastopexies showed a revision rate from 8.7 to 23.2%. The aim of our study is to present some technical refinements for reducing the risk of implant exposure and reoperation. METHODS: We designed a retrospective matched cohort study, including 216 consecutive patients, undergone augmentation mastopexy between January 2013 and December 2022. We divided them in two groups: Group A undergone an inverted-T superomedial pedicled augmentation mastopexy and Group B undergone our inverted-T modified augmentation mastopexy. The groups were matched for clinical and surgical variables, with the surgical technique the only difference between the two. RESULTS: Complications were registered in ten patients (9.3%) in Group A (two wound breakdowns at T with implant exposure and eight wound dehiscences), six of which required surgical revision. In contrast, only three patients (2.8%) in Group B reported a complication, which was wound dehiscence without implant exposure in all cases. None of the dehiscence required surgical revision. The difference between complication and revision rates was statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: Separating the implant and the mastopexy dissection planes reduces the implant exposure and the reoperation rate in one-stage augmentation mastopexy. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors https://link.springer.com/journal/00266 .

How do women perceive their breast image before and after bilateral therapeutic mammoplasty for early breast cancer?

INTRODUCTION: Bilateral therapeutic mammoplasty (BTM) is commonly performed in the UK during treatment for breast cancer, and the available data show oncological safety. This study aims to compare patient-recorded outcome measures before and after surgery, as well as associated patient factors. METHODS: Between March 2018 and December 2019, patients undergoing BTM for breast cancer completed validated BREAST-Q reduction modules before and 3 months after surgery and a radiotherapy domain at 3 months. Scores were correlated with clinical data. For BREAST-Q scales, a higher score (0-100) represents greater satisfaction or quality of life. RESULTS: 28 patients were included, median age 58 years (IQR 52-64), BMI 32.0 (IQR 27.8-34.0). Of these, 1 had bilateral disease, 2 had multifocal disease, and the remaining had unilateral disease. Most (55%) underwent Wise pattern incision. At 3 months post-operatively, the following outcome scores improved based on the Wilcoxon signed-rank test: satisfaction with breasts (median 44 to 84; p < 0.001), psychosocial wellbeing (57.5 to 83; p < 0.001) and sexual wellbeing (48 to 61; p = 0.029). The improvement in satisfaction with breasts score correlated with the preoperative score (p = 0.011), with a larger increase in patients with a lower baseline score. Physical wellbeing was unchanged overall (median 71 to 72). In all solely post-operative domains (satisfaction with information, outcome, nipples and following radiation), patients reported high levels of satisfaction with outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Patients reported improved levels of patient-related quality of life measures after therapeutic mammoplasty, including satisfaction with breasts and psychosocial and sexual wellbeing, with high post-operative outcomes in satisfaction with outcome, information and nipples, as well as radiation Q-score.

Outcomes of whole breast radiation therapy in Asian breast cancer patients with prior cosmetic implants.

BACKGROUND: As breast augmentation has become more popular, an increasing number of women with augmented breasts require treatment for breast cancer. This study aimed to assess the outcomes of postoperative whole breast radiation therapy (WB-RT) in Asian patients with breast cancer who underwent prior cosmetic breast implantation. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 61 patients with breast cancer who had prior cosmetic breast implants (prior-CBI) and underwent breast-conserving surgery (BCS) and WB-RT between 2015 and 2020. The median implant volume was 238.8 cc, with a median interval of 84.7 months between the prior-CBI and BCS. WB-RT was administered with either conventional fractionation (CF-RT) at 50 Gy in 25 fractions (N = 36) or hypofractionation (HF-RT) at 42.6 Gy in 16 fractions (N = 25). The incidences of implant-related complications (IRC) and their contributing factors were analyzed. RESULTS: After a median follow-up of 43.5 months, the 3-year cumulative incidences of IRC and implant loss were 17.2% and 4.9%, respectively. Among the four (6.6%) patients who opted for implant removal after RT, three were potentially related to RT-related capsular contracture. There was no difference in the 3-year cumulative IRC rates following CF-RT and HF-RT (12.2% and 26.7%, respectively; p = 0.120). The risk factors for IRC included a larger implant size (> 260 cc) and a higher ratio of breast tissue to implant volume. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated a favorable safety profile of WB-RT for treatment of breast cancer in Asian women with prior-CBI. The integration of HF-RT following BCS was thought to be a feasible approach.

Delayed complications from polyacrylamide gel breast fillers: a case report.

In the late nineties, polyacrylamide gel (PAAG) gained popularity in China as a soft tissue filler for breast augmentation and contouring, but was banned 10 years later due to the increasing incidence of complications. We report a case of PAAG complication that occurred 20 years after the initial injection, where the patient had significant unilateral breast swelling and an intracapsular lesion. Surgical removal of the breast filler and immediate breast reconstruction was successfully performed, and histology confirmed a benign breast lesion. These findings highlight the importance of clinical awareness of PAAG breast filler complications.

Is free nipple grafting necessary in patients undergoing reduction mammoplasty for gigantomastia? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Gigantomastia is a debilitating condition characterised by an excessive breast tissue growth impacting patients' quality of life. Surgically treatment options include the limited-length pedicle (LP) technique with free nipple grafting (FNG) and the elongated pedicle (EP) technique, which maintains continuity of the nipple-areola complex (NAC). Initially, despite the less satisfactory aesthetic outcome, FNG was preferred to treat hypertrophic breasts requiring resections over 1000 g of parenchymal and adipose tissue, due to concerns about NAC perfusion. Recently, many studies have questioned this indication. The aim of this study was therefore to evaluate the safety of the NAC-carrying EP technique in patients with gigantomastia eventually challenging the need for FNG. METHODS: A literature search using PubMed and Cochrane databases was performed, including studies describing the outcome of EP technique for resection exceeding 1000 g of breast tissue. Thereby, a meta-analysis was conducted to evaluate the rate of NAC necrosis, whereas a descriptive statistic was applied to assess all other surgery-associated complications. RESULTS: Twenty-five studies, encompassing 1355 patients (2656 breasts), were included. EP demonstrated an extremely low rate of NAC necrosis. Moreover, the analysis demonstrated a low rate of ischaemia-independent complications and a very high probability of maintaining NAC-sensation equal to the preoperative state. CONCLUSION: Current evidence indicates that the EP technique should be the preferred surgical method to treat gigantomastia with or without massive ptosis whenever indicated. It has proven to be safe. Furthermore, it yields superior aesthetic and functional outcomes, including breast feeding and preservation of NAC-sensation compared to the LP technique.

Reduction mammoplasty and mastopexy for multiple bilateral fibroadenomas: a case report and literature review.

Treatment of multiple benign breast nodules is sometimes challenging with respect to establishing a surgical plan that achieves both therapeutic and cosmetic goals. Successful application of oncoplastic techniques has been reported in selected cases of benign breast lesions. In this case report, we present the surgical treatment and outcome of a patient with multiple fibroadenomas in ptotic and voluminous breasts. A combined procedure of extensive glandular resection and reduction mammoplasty using a modified vertical pedicle technique was performed on this patient, who desired complete lesion removal, volume reduction, and mastopexy. The cosmetic result was satisfactory at both the short- and mid-term follow-up. In addition, different techniques applied in the treatment of breast fibroadenoma are herein reviewed and discussed.

[Breast implant removal and simultaneous aesthetic optimization : Possibilities, technical considerations and outcome analysis]. / Brustimplantatentfernung und simultane ästhetische Optimierung : Möglichkeiten, technische Überlegungen und Ergebnisanalyse.

BACKGROUND: Breast augmentation is currently the leading aesthetic surgical procedure worldwide. Thus, there is a high prevalence of women with breast implants demanding serious know-how and expertise concerning long-term complication management. Breast implant carriers can suffer from problems and pathologies making implant removal the best solution. The authors of this article have also been confronted more and more with the unspecified complex of symptoms named breast implant disease (BID), also called breast implant illness (BII). The treatment of choice for BID is implant removal. OBJECTIVE: Analysis of problems and solutions regarding implant removal. Specific patient analysis according to patients' breast and body configuration. Technical considerations for surgery and preoperative planning. Evaluation of the authors' techniques. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Evaluation of all patients over a period of 3 years requesting implant removal after esthetic augmentation mammoplasty at the authors' department. All patients were treated according to their specific demands regarding breast shape after implant removal. They either received additional mastopexy, lipofilling or both or simple implant removal without further intervention. Demographic, implant-specific, perioperative and postoperative data have been evaluated for all patients. Additionally, all patients were asked to complete a questionnaire regarding satisfaction and outcome. RESULTS: We observed a trend for more satisfied patients with less invasive procedures (simple implant removal or simultaneous lipofilling vs. explantation and mastopexy ± lipofilling, 1.8 vs. 2.0 or 2.6, p = 0.198). Patients' average scoring was better if they suffered from an implant rupture (1.55 vs. 2.17, p = 0.053). Overall, a high patient satisfaction has been observed for all procedures. CONCLUSION: Breast implant carriers can suffer from problems and pathologies making implant removal the best solution. Exactly these patients, consulting their doctor for those problems and questions seem to profit from implant removal. Simultaneous lipofilling and mastopexy of the breast are good options to nevertheless generate an esthetically pleasing result.

[Breast restoration by the lipomodeling technique after breast sequelae following complications of reduction mammoplasty]. / Rattrapage des séquelles esthétiques de réduction mammaire par la technique du lipomodelage.

BACKGROUND: Complications of reduction mammoplasty can lead to aesthetic sequelae, which are known to be difficult and delicate to treat, and only a few articles deal with this subject. PURPOSE: The objective of this article is to present and analyze our experience of lipomodeling for the secondary management of aesthetic sequelae occurring after a complication of reduction mammoplasty. MATERIAL AND METHODS: An uniform and consecutive series of 22 female patients, operated with the lipomodeling technique from December 2003 to March 2019 by the last author, to correct aesthetic sequelae after secondary complications of reduction mammoplasty was studied analyzing the efficiency and the tolerance of this technique. RESULTS: The results showed 86.4% of very good results and 13.6% of good results. Seventeen patients (77.3%) were highly satisfied with the postoperative outcome, and 5 patients were satisfied (22.7%). The number of procedures varied from 1 to 3: 15 patients (68.2%) underwent only one session of lipomodeling, 5 patients (22.7%) underwent two sessions, and 2 patients (9.1%) underwent three sessions. The mean time between two interventions was 4 months (3-12). No patient of this series initiates any medico-legal proceeding towards the first surgeon. CONCLUSION: After this study, lipomodeling, in association with ancillary procedures, seems to be an effective and safe solution to correct aesthetic sequelae following secondary complications of reduction mammoplasty. It should have a key role for the correction of these sequelae. An effective and appropriate care of these patients leads to good results and patients' final satisfaction, and manages to avoid any medico-legal proceeding, always badly lived as much for the patient as for the first surgeon.

[Breast pillars reconstruction during mammoplasty]. / Technique de reconstitution des piliers du sein au cours des mammoplasties.

The reconstruction of the 2 contiguous breast pillars during a mammoplasty for reduction or treatment of ptosis represents an essential time to define a satisfactory breast curve, to avoid sub-mammary disunions postoperatively, and to contribute to the projection of the nipple areola thus stabilized. The pillars of the breast are the two glandular and fatty columns of segment III of the breast; these pillars have a variable thickness according to the habits of the surgeon but also according to the density of the gland and the residual fat that the practitioner chooses to keep to reformat the breast. Their repair or creation is essential to obtain a nice breast curve and long-term stability.

Factors influencing the shape, size, symmetry and scar of the nipple-areola complex after bilateral reduction mammoplasty.

BACKGROUND: Asymmetry and scar formation of the nipple-areola complex (NAC) after reduction mammoplasty with periareolar suture are common complications and can significantly affect patient satisfaction. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate possible procedure-specific influencing factors on asymmetry and shape disturbances of the nipple-areola complex to optimize postoperative outcome and thus improve patient satisfaction. METHODS: 78 patients were followed-up after a 5-year period as part of a retrospective cohort study. Objective parameters as areolar diameter, symmetry, scar patterns, dimensions of the breast, and anthropometric measurements were recorded. All patients underwent surgery according to an established treatment algorithm depending on the preoperative measurements. Follow up was 1 week, 6 week, 6 months and 3 years postoperatively. RESULTS: The periareolar suture-technique significantly influenced the symmetry and shape of the NAC. Compared to the intraoperative determined diameter and the postoperative diameter, the net-suture technique showed the highest NAC symmetry and minimal divergence. Patients who underwent Hall-Findlay mammoplasty showed significantly higher rates of asymmetry and deformity of the NAC with teardrop formation in comparison to Lejour mammoplasty. Scar formation was affected by periareolar ruffle formation especially after purse string suture. CONCLUSIONS: Regardless of what reduction mammoplasty techniques and periareolar suturing-technique are used, a tension-free suture of the NAC is crucial for shape, symmetry and scar formation. The net suture technique resulted in significantly higher symmetry of the NAC.

The impact of metabolic syndrome in breast reconstruction decision-making and postoperative outcomes: A nationwide analysis.

BACKGROUND: Metabolic syndrome (MetS) is a cluster of cardiometabolic abnormalities including hypertension, obesity, insulin resistance, and dyslipidemia. The safety profiles of patients with MetS undergoing breast reconstruction remain underreported. This study aims to evaluate the impact of MetS on the BR decision-making process and postoperative complication rates. METHODS: The ACS-NSQIP database was utilized to identify women who underwent BR between 2012 and 2021. Baseline characteristics were compared based on the presence of MetS, defined as patients receiving medical treatment for diabetes mellitus and hypertension, with a body mass index greater than 30 kg/m2. Group differences were assessed using t tests and Fisher's exact tests. Multivariate logistic regression models evaluated postoperative complications between the groups. RESULTS: A total of 160,115 patients underwent BR. A total of 4570 had a diagnosis of MetS compared to 155,545 without MetS. No statistically significant differences were observed in the type of BR patients received across cohorts. Logistic regression models demonstrated a higher likelihood of postoperative wound complications (OR 2.21; 95% CI 1.399, 3.478; p = 0.001), and readmission rates (OR 2.045; 95% CI 1.337, 3.128; p = 0.001) in the MetS group compared to the non-MetS patients. No significant differences were identified in other postoperative complications between groups. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with MetS appear to have an increased risk of postoperative wound complications and readmission after breast reconstruction. The synergistic effects of these comorbidities on postoperative outcomes underscore the importance of addressing MetS as a holistic condition and considering choosing Delayed breast reconstruction over Immediate Breast Reconstruction in this population. Thus, integrating MetS management and patient counseling at various stages of BR may improve outcomes and facilitate patient decision-making.

Oncoplastic reduction mammoplasty: Systematic review and proportional meta-analysis of surgical outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Breast-conserving surgery is the standard of care for early-stage breast cancer but can often result in unsatisfactory cosmetic outcomes. Oncoplastic surgery aims to address these issues by combining local excision with plastic surgery techniques to improve oncologic and esthetic outcomes. By incorporating breast reduction techniques into cancer surgery, wider margins of excision can be achieved, leading to enhanced oncological safety and reduced recurrence rates without causing significant asymmetry. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to provide an updated understanding of the surgical outcomes associated with oncoplastic reduction mammoplasty. METHODS: A systematic review of the literature was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines. Articles reporting post-operative outcomes following the oncoplastic reduction mammoplasty were included. A proportional meta-analysis of post-operative complications was performed to obtain their proportions and 95% Confidence Intervals (CIs). RESULTS: Eighteen studies met the inclusion criteria, representing a total of 2711 oncoplastic reduction mammoplasty procedures in 2680 patients. The overall complication rate was 20% (95% CI: 15-25%). The positive margin rate following oncoplastic reduction mammoplasty was 11% (95% CI: 6-17%). The re-excision rate was 6% (95% CI: 3-12%). The completion mastectomy rate was 3% (95% CI: 2-6%). CONCLUSIONS: Oncoplastic reduction mammoplasty is a safe and effective alternative to mastectomy and traditional breast-conserving surgery in the treatment of early-stage breast cancers.